Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 260

In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 3000M Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R7 260 has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
  • Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
  • Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 260 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 14−16
ultra / 1080p 1−2 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 3−4
low / 720p 12−14 30−35
medium / 1080p 4−5 18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro 3000M Radeon R7 260
Architecture Fermi GCN 2.0
Code name Fermi Bonaire
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Release date 22 February 2011 17 December 2013
Pipelines 240 768
Core clock speed 450 MHz
Boost Clock 1100 MHz
Transistor count 1,950 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 18.00 48.00
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 1,536 gflops
Length 170 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 625 MHz 1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 104 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 2.0
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.1
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 28 Mh/s 240 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Eyefinity +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
DDMA audio +
  Check Price Check Price