Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 260
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 260. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 260. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000M
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 260 is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
45−50
95−100
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
90−95
ultra / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
95−100
medium / 1080p
14−16
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
9−10
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
16−18
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000M
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 2.0
Code name
Fermi
Bonaire
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
22 February 2011
17 December 2013
Pipelines
336
768
Core clock speed
475 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.60
48.00
Floating-point performance
638.4 gflops
1,536 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price
