Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 260

When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 260, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 260.

Quadro FX 3800

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 3800 is 28 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 260 is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	1−2	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 725% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	100−110	200−210
medium / 768p	75−80	170−180
ultra / 1080p	30−35	95−100
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	40−45	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 119% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	7−8	35−40
medium / 1080p	2−3	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	4−5	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	1−2	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	GT200B	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2009	17 December 2013
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	48.00
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length	198 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	6.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	1.3
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares