Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 260

When choosing between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260.

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 32 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	200−210
medium / 768p	110−120	170−180
ultra / 1080p	55−60	95−100
QHD / 1440p	30−35	50−55
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	85−90	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	60−65	90−95
ultra / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	95−100
medium / 1080p	24−27	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	20−22
QHD / 1440p	2−3	9−10
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	75−80
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	5−6	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	27−30	50−55
medium / 768p	18−20	30−35
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	GK107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2013	17 December 2013
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	954 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	48.00
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length	202 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares