Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R7 260

When comparing Quadro K4200 and Radeon R7 260, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K4200 and Radeon R7 260 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K4200	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Quadro K4200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K4200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K4200 and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 71 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3775 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
QHD / 1440p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	27−30	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	35−40	24−27
ultra / 1080p	30−33	20−22
QHD / 1440p	14−16	7−8
4K / 2160p	9−10	5−6
low / 720p	70−75	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	230−240	200−210
medium / 768p	200−210	170−180
ultra / 1080p	120−130	95−100
QHD / 1440p	100−105	50−55
4K / 2160p	55−60	30−33
high / 768p	170−180	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	90−95
ultra / 1080p	80−85	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	27−30	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	16−18
QHD / 1440p	20−22	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	55−60	35−40
medium / 1080p	27−30	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	35−40	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	130−140	95−100
medium / 1080p	75−80	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	35−40	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	9−10
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	70−75	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	95−100	75−80
high / 1080p	40−45	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	8−9	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	14−16	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	75−80	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	80−85	50−55
medium / 768p	50−55	30−35
high / 1080p	27−30	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	9−10	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 54% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

	Quadro K4200	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	GK104	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014	17 December 2013
Pipelines	1344	768
Core clock speed	771 MHz
Boost Clock	784 MHz	1100 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	87.81	48.00
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length	241 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	119 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares