Quadro P2000 vs Radeon R7 260

In this comparison between Quadro P2000 and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro P2000	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P2000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro P2000 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 31 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5383 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	8−9
QHD / 1440p	18−20	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 153% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	55−60	24−27
ultra / 1080p	50−55	20−22
QHD / 1440p	35−40	7−8
4K / 2160p	18−20	5−6
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	65−70	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	250−260	200−210
medium / 768p	220−230	170−180
ultra / 1080p	180−190	95−100
QHD / 1440p	110−120	50−55
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	45−50	16−18
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
QHD / 1440p	30−33	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	35−40
medium / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 152% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
QHD / 1440p	30−33	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	20−22
QHD / 1440p	30−35	9−10
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	110−120	50−55
medium / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	140−150	85−90
medium / 768p	130−140	75−80
high / 1080p	70−75	27−30
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	24−27	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	9−10	2−3
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	130−140	50−55
medium / 768p	85−90	30−35
high / 1080p	50−55	18−20
ultra / 1080p	27−30	10−12
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	55−60	35−40
high / 768p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 260.

Full Specs

	Quadro P2000	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP106	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	6 February 2017	17 December 2013
Pipelines	1024	768
Core clock speed	1076 MHz
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	1100 MHz
Transistor count	4,400 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	94.72	48.00
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length	201 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.19 kh/s
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares