Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R7 260
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5300M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
85 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 35% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
Radeon Pro 5300M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
Radeon Pro 5300M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 5300M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
55−60
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
20−22
QHD / 1440p
35−40
7−8
4K / 2160p
18−20
5−6
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
250−260
200−210
medium / 768p
220−230
170−180
ultra / 1080p
180−190
95−100
QHD / 1440p
110−120
50−55
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−33
high / 768p
210−220
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
45−50
16−18
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
60−65
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
95−100
medium / 1080p
110−120
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
60−65
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
20−22
QHD / 1440p
30−35
9−10
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
140−150
85−90
medium / 768p
120−130
75−80
high / 1080p
70−75
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
20−22
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
130−140
50−55
medium / 768p
85−90
30−35
high / 1080p
45−50
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
4K / 2160p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Navi / RDNA
GCN 2.0
Code name
Navi 14
Bonaire
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
13 November 2019
17 December 2013
Pipelines
1280
768
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
6,400 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.0
48.00
Floating-point performance
1,536 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price
