Radeon R7 260 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Radeon R7 260 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 260 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 260	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260.
Radeon R7 260 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 260 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 78 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1507 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	200−210	210−220
medium / 768p	170−180	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	75−80	80−85
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 260	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Bonaire	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	17 December 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed		574 MHz
Boost Clock	1100 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	48.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,536 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	170 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1625 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	104 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX		12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan		N/A
CUDA		2.0
FreeSync	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
HDMI	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	240 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Eyefinity	+
Design	reference
DisplayPort support	+
DDMA audio	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares