FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R7 260X

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 260X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 260X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro M5950 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:

FirePro M5950 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M5950	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 228% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260X - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	6−7	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 185% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	9−10	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	95−100	180−190
ultra / 1080p	45−50	100−110
QHD / 1440p	27−30	55−60
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−35
high / 768p	70−75	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	95−100
ultra / 1080p	30−33	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 75% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	5−6	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	7−8	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 125% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	3−4	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	75−80
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	3−4	10−11
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	9−10	30−35
medium / 1080p	5−6	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
ultra / 1080p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 63% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	30−33
medium / 1080p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	20−22	55−60
medium / 768p	12−14	35−40
high / 1080p	7−8	20−22
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FirePro M5950.

Full Specs

	FirePro M5950	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Terascale 2	GCN 2.0
Code name	Whistler-XT	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 April 2011	8 October 2013
Pipelines	480	896
Core clock speed	725 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.40	61.60
Floating-point performance	696.0 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support	n/a	PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	67 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
Form factor	MXM-A
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R7 260X

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares