FirePro V7900 vs Radeon R7 260X

When comparing FirePro V7900 and Radeon R7 260X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Radeon R7 260X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 31% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260X.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 109 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V7900 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	180−190
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	110−120	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 33% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	75−80
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−33
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	55−60
medium / 768p	24−27	35−40
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 2.0
Code name	Cayman	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2011	8 October 2013
Pipelines	1280	896
Core clock speed	725 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	61.60
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	279 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16	PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares