FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 260X
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 260X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 260X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260X - in Desktops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 136% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
GCN
GCN 2.0
Code name
Mars XTX?
Bonaire
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
12 November 2015
8 October 2013
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
825 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
61.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
225 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
