FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 260X

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 130% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X are build with GCN 2.0 architecture.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W4300 is 1 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	210−220
medium / 768p	170−180	180−190
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	140−150	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	95−100
ultra / 1080p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 7% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	75−80	75−80
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−33
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W4300.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Bonaire	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2015	8 October 2013
Pipelines	768	896
Core clock speed	930 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	61.60
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	171 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares