FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 260X
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 260X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Main Specs
FireStream 9250
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
FireStream 9250 has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260X.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
7−8
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
55−60
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 164% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
30−33
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FireStream 9250.
Full Specs
FireStream 9250
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 2.0
Code name
RV770
Bonaire
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
16 June 2008
8 October 2013
Pipelines
800
896
Core clock speed
625 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
956 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
25.00
61.60
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
104 GB/s
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model
4.1
6.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
225 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
Check Price
