GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 260X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 260X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Radeon R7 260X, check out specs charts below.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 13% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260X.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	9−10	30−35
medium / 1080p	1−2	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p	100−110	210−220
medium / 768p	75−80	180−190
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	55−60
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	95−100
ultra / 1080p	14−16	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	3−4	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 252% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	10−12	55−60
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 112% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3000% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	55−60
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	GK107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	8 October 2013
Pipelines	192	896
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	61.60
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares