Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 260X

When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 260X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 260X.

Quadro FX 3800

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 3800 is 28 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	1−2	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	9−10	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p	100−110	210−220
medium / 768p	75−80	180−190
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	55−60
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	40−45	95−100
ultra / 1080p	14−16	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	4−5	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	55−60
medium / 1080p	4−5	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	1−2	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 93% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1450% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	55−60
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 91% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	GT200B	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2009	8 October 2013
Pipelines	192	896
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	61.60
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	198 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	6.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	1.3
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares