Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 260X
When choosing between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X.
Main Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260X has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 32 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
180−190
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
55−60
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
85−90
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
95−100
ultra / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
9−10
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
75−80
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−33
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
27−30
55−60
medium / 768p
18−20
35−40
high / 1080p
10−11
20−22
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000D
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Code name
GK107
Bonaire
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 March 2013
8 October 2013
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
954 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
61.60
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
202 mm
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
104 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
225 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price