Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R7 260X

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 260X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 260X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K3000M Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 260X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260X - in Desktops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	210−220
medium / 768p	120−130	180−190
ultra / 1080p	55−60	100−110
QHD / 1440p	30−35	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	90−95	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	65−70	95−100
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	9−10	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 67% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	75−80
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−11
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	30−33
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	27−30	55−60
medium / 768p	18−20	35−40
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	N14E-Q1	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 June 2012	8 October 2013
Pipelines	576	896
Core clock speed	654 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	31.39	61.60
Floating-point performance	753.4 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	24 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R7 260X

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares