Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R7 260X

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 260X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 260X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K4100M Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:

Quadro K4100M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K4100M	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 260X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260X - in Desktops.
Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	180−190
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	120−130	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	85−90	100−110
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	65−70	75−80
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−11
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Quadro K4100M.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−33
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	40−45	55−60
medium / 768p	27−30	35−40
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Quadro K4100M.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro K4100M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K4100M	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	N15E-Q3-A2	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	8 October 2013
Pipelines	1152	896
Core clock speed	706 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	67.78	61.60
Floating-point performance	1,627 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	51 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R7 260X

Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares