Quadro K620 vs Radeon R7 260X
When comparing Quadro K620 and Radeon R7 260X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K620 and Radeon R7 260X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Main Specs
Quadro K620
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
41 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
128 Bit
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260X has 180% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Quadro K620 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K620 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 260X is 10 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
20−22
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K620 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
180−190
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
55−60
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
110−120
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 30% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
75−80
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−33
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
40−45
55−60
medium / 768p
24−27
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K620.
Full Specs
Quadro K620
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 2.0
Code name
GM107
Bonaire
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
22 July 2014
8 October 2013
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.98
61.60
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
160 mm
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
104 GB/s
DirectX
12
Shader Model
5
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
104 Mh/s
225 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price