Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R7 260X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 260X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 260X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
128 Bit
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260X has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 260X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 31 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
90−95
55−60
4K / 2160p
50−55
30−35
high / 768p
170−180
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
27−30
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−33
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M2000.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 2.0
Code name
GM206
Bonaire
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
8 April 2016
8 October 2013
Pipelines
768
896
Core clock speed
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
61.60
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
201 mm
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth
104 GB/s
DirectX
12
Shader Model
5
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.2
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
225 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price