Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 260X

When comparing Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R7 260X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R7 260X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Main Specs

  Radeon R7 250 Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors N/A 1 x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R7 260X has 53% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
  • Radeon R7 250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon R7 250 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
  • Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Radeon R7 260X is 2 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 3−4 16−18
ultra / 1080p 1−2 9−10
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
low / 720p 14−16 30−35
medium / 1080p 5−6 20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

  Radeon R7 250 Radeon R7 260X
Architecture GCN GCN 2.0
Code name Oland XT Bonaire
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 1 October 2013 8 October 2013
Pipelines 384 896
Boost Clock 1050 MHz 1000 MHz
Transistor count 950 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 25.20 61.60
Floating-point performance 716.8 gflops 1,971 gflops
Length 168 mm 170 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 104 GB/s
Shared memory -
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
FreeSync + +
Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 3.0
HDMI + +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 117 Mh/s 225 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
Design reference reference
CrossFire +
DDMA audio + +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3 Mh/s 5.16 Mh/s
AppAcceleration +
  Check Price Check Price