FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5950 stacks up against Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.

FirePro M5950 Check Price

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:

FirePro M5950 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M5950	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 5 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	6−7	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	120−130	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	55−60
QHD / 1440p	27−30	30−35
4K / 2160p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	70−75	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	5−6	9−10
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	6−7	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	7−8	−
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Forza Horizon 4 is 27% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	55−60
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	14−16
medium / 1080p	5−6	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than FirePro M5950.
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	20−22	27−30
medium / 768p	12−14	18−20
high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro M5950.

Full Specs

	FirePro M5950	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Terascale 2	GCN
Code name	Whistler-XT	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 April 2011	14 January 2014
Pipelines	480	384
Core clock speed	725 MHz	720 MHz
Transistor count	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.40
Floating-point performance	696.0 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.0
OpenGL	4.4
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
Bus support	n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	67 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-A
	Check Price

FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares