GeForce 820A vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 820A stacks up against Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 820A
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 55 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF117 | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Similar compares
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro 500M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 7730M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 4890
- GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX