GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
When comparing GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 130 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 108% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK208 | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 825M vs HD Graphics 515
- GeForce 825M vs Radeon 520
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon 520
- GeForce 825M vs Radeon HD 4890
- GeForce 825M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX