GeForce 920M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

When choosing between GeForce 920M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.

GeForce 920M Check Price

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:

GeForce 920M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 920M	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 234 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
GeForce 920M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 920M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 920M	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	N16V-GM-S	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	27 January 2015	14 January 2014
Pipelines	384	384
Core clock speed	954 MHz	720 MHz
Transistor count	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	40 Mh/s
Optimus	+
GPU Boost	2.0
GameWorks	+
	Check Price

GeForce 920M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares