GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 76% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | N13E-GTX | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 API | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon HD 4890
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX