GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 224 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 106% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 8970M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 4890
- GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX