GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs

Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−12
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	140−150
medium / 768p	180−190	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	55−60
QHD / 1440p	50−55	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	140−150	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
medium / 768p	90−95	60−65
ultra / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	18−20	9−10
ultra / 1080p	16−18	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	65−70
medium / 1080p	50−55	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	12−14
QHD / 1440p	9−10	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	85−90	55−60
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
high / 1080p	30−33	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	7−8
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	9−10	5−6
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	110−120	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	55−60	27−30
medium / 768p	30−35	18−20
high / 1080p	18−20	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK104	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	14 January 2014
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	720 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares