Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type	System Shared
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is 420 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	18−20
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	140−150
medium / 768p	85−90	110−120
ultra / 1080p	40−45	55−60
QHD / 1440p	24−27	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	60−65	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	6−7	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	6−7	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−11	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	40−45	55−60
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	14−16
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
ultra / 1080p	2−3	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	14−16
medium / 1080p	5−6	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	80−85	90−95
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	16−18	27−30
medium / 768p	12−14	18−20
high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Full Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Gen. 8 Broadwell	GCN
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 June 2015	14 January 2014
Pipelines	48	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	720 MHz
Boost Clock	1150 MHz
Transistor count	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	40.80
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops
Shared memory	+	+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.4
OpenCL	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.80
Laptop size	medium sized
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares