Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 2000M stacks up against Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is 170 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | Fermi | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 640M
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 445M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GT 445M
- Quadro 2000M vs Radeon HD 4890
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX