Quadro K2200 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

In this comparison between Quadro K2200 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Main Specs

  Quadro K2200 Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 326 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
  • Quadro K2200 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 18−20 7−8
ultra / 1080p 10−11 4−5
QHD / 1440p 5−6 0−1
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 35−40 18−20
medium / 1080p 21−24 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2200 Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture Maxwell GCN
Code name GM107 Kaveri Spectre
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 22 July 2014 14 January 2014
Pipelines 640 384
Core clock speed 1046 MHz 720 MHz
Boost Clock 1124 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 44.96
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops
Length 202 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB/s
Shared memory +
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 1.6 Mh/s
  Check Price