Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon 520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Check Price |
- Radeon 520 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Radeon 520 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 310 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Oland | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2017 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon 520 vs GeForce 825M
- Radeon 520 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce 825M
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon 520 vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon 520 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX