Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Kaveri Spectre | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 14 January 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon HD 4890
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M