GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 315 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
- Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU