Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro WX 3200 stacks up against Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri, check out specs charts below.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Check Price

Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Laptops

Main Specs

	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 362 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	16−18	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	140−150
medium / 768p	160−170	110−120
ultra / 1080p	85−90	55−60
QHD / 1440p	50−55	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	120−130	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	85−90	60−65
ultra / 1080p	55−60	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	14−16	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	90−95	65−70
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	7−8	2−3
low / 720p	45−50	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
medium / 768p	65−70	50−55
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	8−9	5−6
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−12	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−105	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	14−16
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	45−50	27−30
medium / 768p	27−30	18−20
high / 1080p	16−18	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri.

Full Specs

	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Polaris	GCN
Code name	Polaris 12	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2019	14 January 2014
Pipelines	640	512
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	720 MHz
Transistor count	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	41.44
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (12_0)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	6.4
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
Laptop size	medium sized
	Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares