GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Radeon R7 A265
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 229 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 202 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK208B | Opal |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Similar compares
- GeForce 920A vs Quadro 2000
- GeForce 920A vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro 2000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GRID K220Q
- GeForce 920A vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics