GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon R7 A265

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Radeon R7 A265
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI No outputs
  Check Price
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti is 203 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 1795 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 12−14 1−2
ultra / 1080p 7−8 0−1
QHD / 1440p 2−3 0−1
low / 720p 27−30 12−14
medium / 1080p 16−18 3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Radeon R7 A265
Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK106 Opal
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 9 October 2012 9 January 2014
Pipelines 768 384
Core clock speed 928 MHz 725 MHz
Boost Clock 825 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million 950 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 59.2 billion/sec 19.80
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops 633.6 gflops
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
CUDA +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.1 kh/s
CUDA cores 768
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support 4 Displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 49 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.26 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5 Mh/s
  Check Price