GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon R7 A265
When choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon R7 A265, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon R7 A265.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 216 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 870M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | − |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15P-GT | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce MX450
- GeForce GTX 870M vs FirePro W8000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce MX450
- Radeon R7 A265 vs FirePro W8000
- GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics