GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 743 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4208 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G1 | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Iris Graphics 540
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics