GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A265

When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A265, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A265.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R7 A265

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A265
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 A265 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	1−2
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	12−14
medium / 1080p	1−2	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	12−14
medium / 1080p	2−3	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
4K / 2160p	9−10	10−11
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	10−11
medium / 1080p	1−2	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 21% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	14−16
medium / 1080p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	40−45
high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	1−2
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	3−4
medium / 1080p	−	2−3
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	8−9
medium / 768p	−	7−8
high / 1080p	2−3	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
high / 768p	27−30	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A265
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK107	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	9 January 2014
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	19.80
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	633.6 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A265

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares