GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 A265

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 A265. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 A265. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K240Q

Radeon R7 A265

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R7 A265
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 A265 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	170−180	110−120
medium / 768p	140−150	85−90
ultra / 1080p	75−80	35−40
QHD / 1440p	40−45	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−12	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	10−11
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	75−80	45−50
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 115% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	65−70	40−45
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	3−4
medium / 1080p	9−10	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	35−40	8−9
medium / 768p	24−27	7−8
high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R7 A265
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	9 January 2014
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	19.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	633.6 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0

GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 A265

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares