Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon R7 A265
When choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon R7 A265, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon R7 A265.
Radeon R7 A265
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | eDRAM | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics