Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | LPDDR4x | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 2466 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 31 October 2020 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 670
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics