P106 090 vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between P106 090 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Radeon R7 A265
Main Specs
P106 090 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 629 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6208 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 371% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
P106 090 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Opal |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 31 July 2017 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |