Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 271% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 71% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 130% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K3100M vs GRID K280Q
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics