Radeon HD 8730M vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 8730M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
Radeon HD 8730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8730M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon HD 8730M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8730M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8730M.
- Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8730M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon HD 8730M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars | Opal |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 9 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 700 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.80 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 537.6 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 8730M vs GeForce GTS 160M
- Radeon HD 8730M vs GeForce 8800 GTX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTS 160M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce 8800 GTX
- Radeon HD 8730M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon HD 8730M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics