Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 193% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2017 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 770M
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Quadro 6000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 770M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro 6000
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics