Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon R9 M395X.
Radeon R7 A265
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A265 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Radeon R7 A265 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A265 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 550 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 642% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 170% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 373% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 612% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 293% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 1350% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 880% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Opal | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 January 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 760
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 760