Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
In this comparison between Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A265 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A265 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A265 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R7 A265 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 293% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Opal | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 January 2014 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M