Radeon R7 A265 vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 A265 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 A265 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Radeon R7 A265

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 A265	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)		238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Radeon R7 A265 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 A265 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	4−5	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	110−120	220−230
medium / 768p	85−90	190−200
ultra / 1080p	35−40	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	70−75
4K / 2160p	10−11	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	18−20	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	10−11	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	110−120
medium / 1080p	8−9	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	3−4	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	40−45	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	3−4	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	1−2	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	3−4	35−40
medium / 1080p	2−3	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	3−4	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	8−9	65−70
medium / 768p	7−8	40−45
high / 1080p	3−4	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 A265	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Opal	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	9 January 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	384	448
Core clock speed	725 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	825 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	19.80	32.14
Floating-point performance	633.6 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

Radeon R7 A265 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares